A universal cellular automaton is a cellular automaton which, like a Turing machine, exhibits universality. von Neumann proved that an automaton consisting of cells with four orthogonal neighbors and 29 possible states would be capable of simulating a Turing machine for some configuration of about cells (Gardner 1983, p. 227).
The outlines of a proof that the two-dimensional game of life outer-totalistic cellular automaton is universal were given by Berlekamp, Conway, and Guy (1982) and independently by Gosper (Gardner 1983, pp. 250-253). Around 2000, a Turing machine was explicitly implemented in life by P. Rendell (Rendell, Adamatzky 2001). While Rendell's machine can be made into a "true" universal computer simply by making his tape infinite, he neither noted this fact nor provided an actual construction of a universal Turing machine. Subsequently, on November 11, 2002, P. Chapman constructed a game of life pattern that implements the actions of a universal register machine, thus explicitly proving the game of life to be universal.
More amazingly still, even one-dimensional cellular automata can be universal. Wolfram (2002, pp. 644-656) gave an example of a 19-color universal one-dimensional next-nearest neighbor cellular automaton in which a block of 20 cells is used to represent each single cell in the cellular automaton being emulated. The examples above show the first few steps of the 19-color universal automaton emulating rule 90 and rule 30, respectively (Wolfram 2002, pp. 646-647).
Smith (1971) showed that 18 colors and nearest-neighbor 1-dimensional rules could be universal, and Lindgren and Nordahl (1990) constructed a 7-color nearest-neighbor universal cellular automaton. And most amazingly of all, as shown by Wolfram (2002, pp. 675-691), two colors and nearest neighbor rules are sufficient for producing universality in a 1-dimensional cellular automaton. In particular, although it is anything but straightforward to prove, the rule 110 elementary cellular automaton is universal (Cook 2004).
Gacs (2001) has proven that there exist fault-tolerant universal cellular automata, whose ability to simulate other cellular automata is not hindered by random perturbations provided that such perturbations are sufficiently sparse.