Riemann defined the function by
(1)
| |||
(2)
| |||
(3)
|
(Hardy 1999, p. 30; Borwein et al. 2000; Havil 2003, pp. 189-191 and 196-197; Derbyshire 2004, p. 299), sometimes denoted ,
(Edwards 2001, pp. 22 and 33; Derbyshire 2004, p. 298),
or
(Havil 2003, p. 189). Note that this is not an infinite series since the terms
become zero starting at
, and where
is the floor function
and
is the base-2 logarithm. For
, 2, ..., the first few values are 0, 1, 2, 5/2, 7/2, 7/2,
9/2, 29/6, 16/3, 16/3, ... (OEIS A096624 and
A096625). As can be seen, when
is a prime,
jumps by 1; when it is the square of a prime, it jumps
by 1/2; when it is a cube of a prime, it jumps by 1/3; and so on (Derbyshire 2004,
pp. 300-301), as illustrated above.
Amazingly, the prime counting function
is related to
by the Möbius transform
(4)
|
where
is the Möbius function (Riesel 1994, p. 49;
Havil 2003, p. 196; Derbyshire 2004, p. 302). More amazingly still,
is connected with the Riemann zeta function
by
(5)
|
(Riesel 1994, p. 47; Edwards 2001, p. 23; Derbyshire 2004, p. 309).
is also given by
(6)
|
where
is the Riemann zeta function, and (5)
and (6) form a Mellin transform
pair.
Riemann (1859) proposed that
(7)
|
where
is the logarithmic integral and the sum is
over all nontrivial zeros
of the Riemann zeta
function
(Mathews 1961, Ch. 10; Landau 1974, Ch. 19;
Ingham 1990, Ch. 4; Hardy 1999, p. 40; Borwein et al. 2000; Edwards
2001, pp. 33-34; Havil 2003, p. 196; Derbyshire 2004, p. 328). Actually,
since the sum of roots is only conditionally convergent, it must be summed in order
of increasing
even when pairing terms
with their "twins"
, so
(8)
|
(Edwards 2001, pp. 30 and 33).
This formula was subsequently proved by Mangoldt (1895; Riesel 1994, p. 47; Edwards 2001, pp. 48 and 62-65). The integral on the right-hand side converges
only for ,
but since there are no primes less than 2, the only values of interest are for
.
Since it is monotonic decreasing, the maximum therefore occurs at
, which has value
(9)
|
(OEIS A096623; Derbyshire 2004, p. 329).
Riemann also considered the function
(10)
|
sometimes also denoted (Borwein et al. 2000), obtained by replacing
in the Riemann function with the logarithmic
integral
, where
is the Riemann zeta
function and
is the Möbius function
(Hardy 1999, pp. 16 and 23; Borwein et al. 2000; Havil 2003, p. 198).
is plotted above, including on a semilogarithmic scale (bottom two plots), which
illustrate the fact that
has a series of zeros near the origin. These occur at
for
(OEIS A143530), 15300.7, 21381.5, 25461.7,
32711.9, 40219.6, 50689.8, 62979.8, 78890.2, 98357.8, ..., corresponding to
(OEIS A143531),
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, ....
The quantity is plotted above.
This function is implemented in the Wolfram Language as RiemannR[x].
Ramanujan independently derived the formula for , but nonrigorously (Berndt 1994, p. 123; Hardy 1999,
p. 23). The following table compares
and
for small
. Riemann conjectured that
(Knuth 1998, p. 382), but this was disproved
by Littlewood in 1914 (Hardy and Littlewood 1918).
The Riemann prime counting function is identical to the Gram series
(11)
|
where
is the Riemann zeta function (Hardy 1999,
pp. 24-25), but the Gram series is much more
tractable for numeric computations. For example, the plots above show the difference
where
is computed using the Wolfram Language's
built-in NSum command (black) and approximated using the first
(blue),
(green),
(yellow),
(orange), and
(red) points.
In the table, denotes the nearest
integer function. Note that the values given by Hardy (1999, p. 26) for
are incorrect.
Sloane | A057793 | A057794 |
1 | 5 | 1 |
2 | 26 | 1 |
3 | 168 | 0 |
4 | 1227 | |
5 | 9587 | |
6 | 78527 | 29 |
7 | 664667 | 88 |
8 | 5761552 | 97 |
9 | 50847455 | |
10 | 455050683 | |
11 | 4118052495 | |
12 | 37607910542 |
Riemann's function is related to the prime counting function by
(12)
|
where the sum is over all complex (nontrivial) zeros
of
(Ribenboim 1996), i.e., those in the critical strip
so
,
interpreted to mean
(13)
|
However, no proof of the equality of (12) appears to exist in the literature (Borwein et al. 2000).