Consider a network of
resistors
so that
may be connected in series or parallel with
,
may be connected in series or parallel with the network
consisting of
and
,
and so on. The resistance of two resistors in series is given by
(1)
|
and of two resistors in parallel by
(2)
|
The possible values for two resistors with resistances and
are therefore
(3)
|
for three resistances ,
, and
are
(4)
|
and so on. These are obviously all rational numbers, and the numbers of distinct arrangements for ,
2, ..., are 1, 2, 8, 46, 332, 2874, ... (OEIS A005840),
which also arises in a completely different context (Stanley 1991).
If the values are restricted to , then there are
possible resistances for
1-
resistors, ranging from a minimum of
to a maximum of
. Amazingly, the largest denominators for
, 2, ... are 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, ..., which are immediately
recognizable as the Fibonacci numbers (OEIS A000045). The following table gives the values
possible for small
.
possible resistances | |
1 | 1 |
2 | |
3 | |
4 |
If the
resistors are given the values 1, 2, ...,
, then the numbers of possible net resistances for 1, 2, ...
resistors are 1, 2, 8, 44, 298, 2350, ... (OEIS A051045).
The following table gives the values possible for small
.
possible resistances | |
1 | 1 |
2 | |
3 | |
4 |