There are a number of point processes which are called Hawkes processes and while many of these notions are similar, some are rather different. There are also different formulations for univariate and multivariate point processes.
In some literature, a univariate Hawkes process is defined to be a self-exciting temporal point process whose conditional
intensity function
is defined to be
(1)
|
where
is the background rate of the process
, where
are the points in time occurring prior to time
, and where
is a function which governs the clustering density of
. The function
is sometimes called the exciting function or the excitation
function of
.
Similarly, some authors (Merhdad and Zhu 2014) denote the conditional intensity function
by
and rewrite the summand in () as
(2)
|
The processes upon which Hawkes himself made the most progress were univariate self-exciting temporal point processes whose conditional intensity function
is linear (Hawkes
1971). As a result, some authors refer to such processes as Hawkes processes. In
general, however, such
behavior is typically specified, i.e., processes for which
is linear are referred to as linear Hawkes processes
and are differentiated from their non-linear counterparts whose conditional intensity
functions
are non-linear (Merhdad and Zhu 2014).
Still other authors consider two alternative brands of univariate Hawkes processes, one the so-called intensity-based Hawkes process and the other the so-called cluster-based
version, which are equivalent though are studied in different contexts (Dassios and
Zhao 2013). In this case, the intensity-based process is a temporal point process
on
which has a nonnegative exponentially-decaying
-stochastic intensity
of the form
(3)
|
for ,
where
is a history of the process
with respect to which
is adapted,
is the constant reversion level,
is the initial intensity at time
,
is the constant
rate of exponential decay,
are the sizes of the self-excited jumps viewed
as independent random
variables distributed according to some distribution
function
,
, and
and
are assumed to be independent of one another. This is
equivalent to the cluster-based version in which () is viewed as a marked Poisson cluster process
, the only
difference being that from the cluster-based perspective:
1. The set
consists of elements known as immigrants which are distributed as an inhomogeneous
Poisson process with rate
(4)
|
for .
2. The set
of marks associated to the immigrants
are independent of the immigrants and are distributed as independent
random variables according to some distribution
.
3. Each immigrant
generates a single cluster
independent of other clusters where here, each
is viewed as a random set subject to a certain branching
structure (Dassios and Zhao 2013) which satisfies the property that
.
In addition to these ambiguities, several authors (e.g., Merhdad and Zhu 2014), have made generalized versions of the univariate process described in () which are still
referred to as Hawkes processes. One example includes adapting () so that the process
has different exciting functions, the result of which is a collection of non-explosive simple
point processes for which:
1.
is an inhomogeneous Poisson process with intensity
at time
;
2. For every ,
is a simple point process with intensity
(5)
|
3. For every ,
is an inhomogeneous Poisson process
with intensity
conditional on
.
In this context, the function is said to be a univariate Hawkes process
with excitation functions
while
is called the immigrant process and
the
th generation offspring process (Merhdad and Zhu 2014). Note
that when
and when
for any
,
this extended model reduces to the classical linear model ().
Due to the vast usage of the term Hawkes process among univariate point processes, one expects there to be room for an equally large number of definitions of multivariate
Hawkes processes. Surprisingly, however, the most common use of the term is assigned
to a relatively straightforward extension of equations () and (), whereby one says
that a multivariate -dimensional counting process
taking values in
is a multivariate Hawkes process whenever
the associated intensity function
defined by
(6)
|
for ,
...,
has the form
(7)
|
(Bacry et al. 2012). Here, stands for probability,
is the sigma-algebra
generated by
up to present time
,
, and
for
.
It is worth noting, however, that precisely as with the univariate case, some authors distinguish between different "types" of multivariate Hawkes processes (Liniger 2009) while other authors define completely separate types of multivariate functions to be multivariate Hawkes processes (Carlsson et al. 2007).