Let
be a number field with
real embeddings and
imaginary embeddings and let
. Then the multiplicative group of units
of
has the form
(1)
|
where
is a primitive
th
root of unity, for the maximal
such that there is a primitive
th root of unity of
. Whenever
is quadratic,
(unless
, in which case
, or
, in which case
). Thus,
is isomorphic to the group
. The
generators
for
are called the fundamental units of
. Real quadratic number fields and imaginary cubic number fields
have just one fundamental unit and imaginary quadratic number fields have no fundamental
units. Observe that
is the order of the torsion subgroup of
and that the
are determined up to a change of
-basis and up to a multiplication by a root of unity.
The fundamental unit of a number field is intimately connected with the regulator.
The fundamental units of a field generated by the algebraic
number
can be computed in the Wolfram Language
using NumberFieldFundamentalUnits[a].
In a real quadratic field, there exists a special unit known as the fundamental unit such that all units
are given by
, for
,
,
, .... The notation
is sometimes used instead of
(Zucker and Robertson 1976). The fundamental units for real quadratic fields
may be computed from the fundamental solution of
the Pell equation
(2)
|
where the sign is taken such that the solution has smallest possible positive
(LeVeque 1977; Cohn 1980, p. 101; Hua 1982; Borwein and
Borwein 1987, p. 294). If the positive sign is taken, then one solution is simply
given by
,
where
is the solution to the Pell equation
(3)
|
However, this need not be the minimal solution. For example, the solution to Pell equation
(4)
|
is ,
so
,
but
is the minimal solution.
For nonsquare positive integers, the minimal s are given by 2, 4, 1, 10, 16, 2, 6, 20, 4, 3, 30, 8, 8, 34,
340, 4, 5, ... (OEIS A048941), while the minimal
s are given by 2, 2, 1, 4, 6, 1, 2, 6,
1, 1, 8, 2, 2, 8, 78, 1, 1, 84, ... (OEIS A048942).
Given a minimal
,
the fundamental unit is given by
(5)
|
(Cohn 1980, p. 101).
The following table gives fundamental units for small .
2 | 54 | ||
3 | 55 | ||
5 | 56 | ||
6 | 57 | ||
7 | 58 | ||
8 | 59 | ||
10 | 60 | ||
11 | 61 | ||
12 | 62 | ||
13 | 63 | ||
14 | 65 | ||
15 | 66 | ||
17 | 67 | ||
18 | 68 | ||
19 | 69 | ||
20 | 70 | ||
21 | 71 | ||
22 | 72 | ||
23 | 73 | ||
24 | 74 | ||
26 | 75 | ||
27 | 76 | ||
28 | 77 | ||
29 | 78 | ||
30 | 79 | ||
31 | 80 | ||
32 | 82 | ||
33 | 83 | ||
34 | 84 | ||
35 | 85 | ||
37 | 86 | ||
38 | 87 | ||
39 | 88 | ||
40 | 89 | ||
41 | 90 | ||
42 | 91 | ||
43 | 92 | ||
44 | 93 | ||
45 | 94 | ||
46 | 95 | ||
47 | 96 | ||
48 | 97 | ||
50 | 98 | ||
51 | 99 | ||
52 | 101 | ||
53 | 102 |
The following table given the squarefree numbers for which the denominator of
is
for
or 2. These sequences turn out to be related to Eisenstein's
problem: there is no known fast way to compute them for large
(Finch).